Policy makers have developed different forms of policy intervention for stopping,
or preventing runs on financial firms. This paper provides a general framework to
characterize the types of policy intervention that indeed lower the run-propensity
of investors versus those that cause adverse investor behavior, which increases the
run-propensity. I employ a general global game to analyze and compare a large set
of regulatory policies. I show that common policies such as bailouts, Emergency
Liquidity Assistance, and withdrawal fees either exhibit features that lower firm
stability ex ante, or have offsetting features rendering the policy ineffective.
moral-hazard delegation Robust Information Design technology adoption manipulation